Prince Andrew just STFU will ya!

I don’t know why Britain’s Prince Andrew keeps denying that he is a sex loony who was tight with the recently deceased convicted registered sex offender Jeffery Epstein. Despite Prince Andrews repeated denials, the facts convict him. Prince Andrew has told multiple lies, over the last decade or more, related to his relationships with both Epstein and the teenage girls made available to Prince Andrew by Epstein. So here we go yet again, or LIE number 1,000 with Prince Andrew yet again denying he is a sex pervert who enjoys using 16 year old girls for his amusement. And yeah, just like with Matt Groening sucking on the toes of a 16 year old teenager, when Matt was 45 years old, which to Doomer Doug at least is a sex crime. Further, Prince Andrew’s original denials indicated that he wasn’t a regular guest with Epstein. Oh no, it was a flight on the so called Lolita Express, to the Virgin Island with the nickname of “Orgy Island,” where Prince Andrew did God knows what. Perhaps the totally corrupt FBI, ie the one that let all the computers on “Orgy Island,” vanish, or what happened to the concrete truck, or, well you get the idea. The link below indicates Prince Andrew was a long term guest, as in ONE WEEK, stay. It also indicates that Prince Andrew has told MULTIPLE LIES over the years. We now know Prince Andrew spent time in Epstein’s London apartment, especially in the bathroom where he sucked on a 16 year old girl’s toe, among other things. It is long past time for this Royal Sex Pervert to finally face criminal charges. The link is here; perhaps now that the Guardian is outing Prince Andrew he may finally be stripped of his title and sent to the island of Saint Helena like Napoleon was.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7391369/Prince-Andrew-spent-six-days-Jeffrey-Epsteins-home-two-years-convicted.html

Prince Andrew hits back – but fails to quell Jeffrey Epstein storm as it emerges he spent a WEEK at Jeffrey Epstein’s New York mansion after the royal issues extraordinary statement

  • The Duke of York stayed over a period of six days in 2010, The Mail On Sunday revealed
  • This was two years after the businessman was convicted of having sex with a child
  • The Duke said he never suspected the shamed financier of criminal behaviour

The Duke of York spent almost a week at convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s infamous New York home, The Mail on Sunday can reveal.

The revelation came as Prince Andrew yesterday issued an extraordinary statement in which he sought to downplay his ten-year friendship with Epstein.

In his statement – the second issued since last weekend when The Mail on Sunday revealed footage of the Queen’s favourite son at Epstein’s Manhattan mansion in 2010 – the Duke said he had never suspected the shamed financier of criminal behaviour.

He also insisted that he and Epstein, who committed suicide in a New York prison cell two weeks ago, only saw each other ‘infrequently and probably no more than only once or twice a year’.

However, The Mail on Sunday understands that the Duke stayed over a period of six days with Epstein in 2010, two years after the multi-millionaire businessman was convicted of having sex with a child.

Our exclusive video, which made headlines around the world after its release, showed the Prince in the mansion’s doorway on December 6, 2010, waving off a brunette.

It prompted first a statement from Buckingham Palace and yesterday another from the Duke himself in which he desperately tried to draw a line under the affair. The Duke admitted he and Epstein could have potentially met up to 20 times but that ‘at no stage during the limited time I spent with him did I see, witness or suspect any behaviour of the sort that subsequently led to his arrest and conviction’.

Epstein also threw a party at his home on December 2, 2010, for the Duke, who was last seen at the property five days later. Last night, Buckingham Palace declined to discuss details of his visit.

However, some commentators said that far from putting a lid on the scandal, the statement actually raised more questions than it answered. Others said it did not go far enough.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s