Obama has now decided to go to war in Syria. Here is the full text of our Nobel Peace Prize winning warmonger. Listen to Doomer Doug on this: RUSSIA WILL NOT ALLOW A NO FLY ZONE TO BE CREATED!
Fact One. The so called “Syrian Rebels” are Muslim Terrorists.
Fact Two. They have already murdered Christian, Kurds and even a 14 year Muslim kid for “blashphemy.”
We are looking at Libya on steroids here. By the way, how is the Islamic government in Libya looking these days?
Fact Three. Russia has already deployed combat forces to Cyprus. You didn’t think that the EU could steal tens of billions of Euros from Russian depositors and not get payback? Cyprus is now a permanent Russian naval base. Russia is also deploying advanced anti-aircraft missiles into Syria. Russian combat troops will not be far behind. Putin already offered to replace the departing UN Austrian troops on the Golan Heights.
Is Obama really that brain dead? Come on all you liberal yahoos make some more excuses for your hero Obama. OBAMA IS GOING TO START A SHOOTING WAR IN SYRIA. It will take a month or two to get things lined up in Jordan. It will cost roughly ONE POINT FIVE BILLION DOLLARS A MONTH TO RUN A NO FLY ZONE. This assumes our planes don’t start getting shot down. Mcain the brain dead zombie and Graham the RINO were foaming at the mouth. The zionists want a war. The zionists control the USA along with the neo cons. We will get a war out of this. The only people using nerve gas in Syria are the Muslim terrorists in the Syrian opposition. Obama needs a wag the dog scenario to distract from his multiple scandals. We shall see how Japan reacts when they figure out no more oil will be coming out of the Mideast.
Here is the full text from zerohedge.com
Full White House Statement On Syria’s “Red Line” Crossing
Tyler Durden’s picture
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 06/13/2013 18:01 -0400
What comes after George Bush and George Bush Jr.? Must be George Bush the Third, only this time armed with a Nobel peace prize. Seriously, are they that stupid to think they can rerun the entire Iraq invasion scenario without changing anything? And is the US public really that dumb to let it slide? And how many Syrian citizens and US soldiers have to die in what is the most glaring instance in the past decade of a wag the dog-type distraction from on onslaught of domestic administration scandals?
Complete Text of White House Statement on Chemical Weapons in Syria
Following is the statement issued by the White House in the name of Benjamin J. Rhodes, deputy national security adviser.
At the President’s direction, the United States Government has been closely monitoring the potential use of chemical weapons within Syria. Following the assessment made by our intelligence community in April, the President directed the intelligence community to seek credible and corroborated information to build on that assessment and establish the facts with some degree of certainty. Today, we are providing an updated version of our assessment to Congress and to the public.
The Syrian government’s refusal to grant access to the United Nations to investigate any and all credible allegations of chemical weapons use has prevented a comprehensive investigation as called for by the international community. The Assad regime could prove that its request for an investigation was not just a diversionary tactic by granting the UN fact finding mission immediate and unfettered access to conduct on-site investigations to help reveal the truth about chemical weapons use in Syria.
While pushing for a UN investigation, the United States has also been working urgently with our partners and allies as well as individuals inside Syria, including the Syrian opposition, to procure, share, and evaluate information associated with reports of chemical weapons use so that we can establish the facts and determine what took place.
Following a deliberative review, our intelligence community assesses that the Assad regime has used chemical weapons, including the nerve agent sarin, on a small scale against the opposition multiple times in the last year. Our intelligence community has high confidence in that assessment given multiple, independent streams of information. The intelligence community estimates that 100 to 150 people have died from detected chemical weapons attacks in Syria to date; however, casualty data is likely incomplete. While the lethality of these attacks make up only a small portion of the catastrophic loss of life in Syria, which now stands at more than 90,000 deaths, the use of chemical weapons violates international norms and crosses clear red lines that have existed within the international community for decades.
We believe that the Assad regime maintains control of these weapons. We have no reliable, corroborated reporting to indicate that the opposition in Syria has acquired or used chemical weapons.
The body of information used to make this intelligence assessment includes reporting regarding Syrian officials planning and executing regime chemical weapons attacks; reporting that includes descriptions of the time, location, and means of attack; and descriptions of physiological symptoms that are consistent with exposure to a chemical weapons agent. Some open source reports from social media outlets from Syrian opposition groups and other media sources are consistent with the information we have obtained regarding chemical weapons use and exposure. The assessment is further supported by laboratory analysis of physiological samples obtained from a number of individuals, which revealed exposure to sarin. Each positive result indicates that an individual was exposed to sarin, but it does not tell us how or where the individuals were exposed or who was responsible for the dissemination.
We are working with allies to present a credible, evidentiary case to share with the international community and the public. Since the creation of the UN fact finding mission, we have provided two briefings to Dr. Åke Sellström, the head of the mission. We will also be providing a letter to UN Secretary General Ban, calling the UN’s attention to our updated intelligence assessment and specific incidents of alleged chemical weapons use. We request that the UN mission include these incidents in its ongoing investigation and report, as appropriate, on its findings. We will present additional information and continue to update Dr. Sellström as new developments emerge.
The President has been clear that the use of chemical weapons – or the transfer of chemical weapons to terrorist groups – is a red line for the United States, as there has long been an established norm within the international community against the use of chemical weapons. Our intelligence community now has a high confidence assessment that chemical weapons have been used on a small scale by the Assad regime in Syria. The President has said that the use of chemical weapons would change his calculus, and it has. Our decision making has already been guided by the April intelligence assessment and by the regime’s escalation of horrific violence against its citizens. Following on the credible evidence that the regime has used chemical weapons against the Syrian people, the President has augmented the provision of non-lethal assistance to the civilian opposition, and also authorized the expansion of our assistance to the Supreme Military Council (SMC), and we will be consulting with Congress on these matters in the coming weeks. This effort is aimed at strengthening the effectiveness of the SMC, and helping to coordinate the provision of assistance by the United States and other partners and allies. Put simply, the Assad regime should know that its actions have led us to increase the scope and scale of assistance that we provide to the opposition, including direct support to the SMC. These efforts will increase going forward.
The United States and the international community have a number of other legal, financial, diplomatic, and military responses available. We are prepared for all contingencies, and we will make decisions on our own timeline. Any future action we take will be consistent with our national interest, and must advance our objectives, which include achieving a negotiated political settlement to establish an authority that can provide basic stability and administer state institutions; protecting the rights of all Syrians; securing unconventional and advanced conventional weapons; and countering terrorist activity.